Interpersonal Relationships

A research paper on interpersonal relationships should demonstrate the application of a real-life experience or future scenario by communication topic and addressing your topic with the learning outcomes listed below. Have Paper Masters write research for you on interpersonal relationships.

Perhaps the greatest event in a person's life is to gain a relationship because it provides a major source of support when we are in times of trouble or when we need someone with whom to share our successes or for someone to add spice to the otherwise dull, routine times in our lives. Those sources of support are found in our family, from friends, co-workers and neighbors as they help us develop a sense of trust and caring, provide those we can confide in, help us develop -- -->, give us tangible and material help, give us information and a sense of belonging. But despite these positive aspects of close ongoing relationships it also seems people readily identify differences between one another which can become a source of conflict in those relationships.The wife cannot understand why her husband is able to be friendly with everyone at a party while she sits at a table with two or three long-term friends.The boss cannot understand why a couple committee members are never quite satisfied with the decisions made at the last committee meeting and complain that no one listens to them.The tendency seems to be to conclude that the other person is wrong, picky, quirky, sabotaging and worse.Sometimes such conclusions can lead to a dissatisfying marriage relationship or termination of employment or the end of a friendship. The stereotypical solution is to improve interpersonal communication.The assumption being that if everyone just talks their difference out problems will be solved.As explored in this paper, a way of improving interpersonal communication is to have a greater understanding of your own personality and the personality of others.Specifically, this paper will explore how applying the Myers-Briggs (personality) Type Indicator to relationships can reduce conflict, increase appreciation for the differences in others and improve interpersonal communication.

Isabel Briggs Myers and Katherine Cook Briggs started to develop the MBTI in the early 1940s "to make C.G. Jung's theory of human personality understandable and useful in everyday life." (APT) First the model suggests each of us have "type" preferences which fall somewhere along four different continuums.

Those continuums include:

Extroversion(E) <---------------------------> Introversion(I)
Sensing(S) <--------------------------------> Intuition(N)
Thinking(T) <-------------------------------> Feeling(F)
Judging(J) <--------------------------------> Perceiving(P)

Briefly, each of these on the continuum have specific definitions which are summarized here:

• Extroversion (E): These people prefer to be in the middle of activities, to be included in communications, are more likely to need to talk things through and will develop thoughts through their interaction with others. They are social.They have lots of friends, remember otherpeople's names, seem to be in a hurry and think aloud.
• Introversion (I): These people prefer to communicate in writing. They are careful to think before they talk.They want to "have all their duck in a row" before "going public." The Introvert tends to have a few close friends and confidants.
• Sensing (S): Sensing people tend to be sequential.That is, they learn and perform tasks on a step-by-step basis.There is Step 1, followed by Step 2, then Step 3 and soon.They are the "Joe Fridays" of the world.They want "just the facts."They want specifics and are a wealth of
  information.
• Intuition (N): Because Intuitives have a feeling for theintervening steps, they can jump from Step 1 to Step 5. They find it easier to interpret and extrapolate.They trust the educated guess.
• Thinkers (T): Thinkers tend to have a low tolerance forsmall talk, lengthy discussions on peripheral orirrelevant issues, people who seem to "ramble" and whenthere is no conclusion to the issue. They want a plan, results and some sort of conclusion.
• Feelers (F): The Feeler tends to focus on harmony in relationships.They like the personal touch, relating directly to people and seek those with similar values and interests.
• Judging (J): Judging people prefer structure. They like order. They like to bring closure to tasks, events, etc. so they can move on with their lives.
• Perceiving (P): Perceptives like to keep things open. They are more interested in the process of discussion than with coming to a conclusion.

The paper must be a discussion that explores, supports, and answers the following learning outcomes:

• Explain the principles and misconceptions in effective interpersonal relationships.
  
• Identify the barriers to effective interpersonal interactions.
• Define emotional intelligence and its role in effective interpersonal relationships.
• Understand the impact of gender and culture on interpersonal relationships.
• Understand how perceptions, emotions, and nonverbal expression affect interpersonal relationships.
  

Paper Criteria for Interpersonal Relationships Research Paper:

1. The paper must be clear, engaging, original, and focused; ideas and content are richly developed with details and examples.
2. Organization and form enhance the central idea and theme; ideas are presented coherently to move the reader through the text. The voice of the writer is compelling and conveys the writer's meaning through effective sentence structure and precise word choices.
3. The writer successfully moves the paper through academic constructs and experiential documentation to critical analysis.
4. The paper demonstrates a clear balance of these three components.
5. The paper is developed through coherently linked paragraphs, each devoted to an aspect of the topic.
6. The vocabulary and diction represent college-level usage.
7. The grammar, spelling, and APA style in this paper must be correct. This means students must use complete sentences and make minimal grammar mistakes.