Prolife Versus Prochoice
Pro-life versus pro-choice research papers report that while many pro-life activists contend restricting a woman's right to choose if she wishes to have an abortion is a moral imperative, pro-choice advocates clearly remind us of the stark realities of having unwanted children. Pro-life versus pro-choice term papers note that if the Supreme Court were to overturn Roe vs. Wade, many women would simply turn to underground abortions as they did prior to 1973. Pro-life versus pro-choice term papers write that problems such as the following occur if there is no choice for a woman and those who do not want to risk the possibility of being caught will choose to have unwanted children leading to:
- The numbers of unwanted children born will increase
- The incidence of abandoned children will rise
- An increase in child abuse will occur
- Juvenile crime rates will skyrocket
- The number of dysfunctional families will rise also
Under this proposition, everyone in society ultimately loses. Adding to this argument, Pro-life versus pro-choice term papers debate that the choice to give birth to a child is not always the right one. This Pro-life versus pro-choice term paper's debate contends that under some circumstances giving birth may be socially dysfunctional, morally irresponsible and downright cruel.
No matter whom you talk to, every person will have a different opinion in a pro-life versus pro-choice term paper. Although many people would like to believe that their opinion is the right one, the truth of the matter is that when it comes to the issue of abortion a woman's right to choose should be placed above all other considerations. Whether a woman chooses to have an abortion or not, the choice will invariable effect the rest of her life; telling her she does not control her life is morally, ethically and legally wrong.