Have Paper Masters custom write your project today!
Article critiques are an essential part of graduate research. The first part of the critique is at the knowledge/comprehension level. The second part of the critique includes analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the study, identification of logical linkages among component parts of a study, and evaluation of the study’s quality and usefulness for practice.
a.Identify the specific design of the study.
b.Identify the treatment or intervention if appropriate for the study conducted.
c.How were subjects assigned to groups if groups were studied?
d.Were pilot study findings used to design this study? If yes, briefly discuss the pilot and the changes made in this study based on the pilot.
a.Identify inclusion and exclusion sample criteria.
b.Indicate the method used to obtain the sample.
c.State the sample size. Indicate if a power analysis was conducted to determine the sample size. Identify the refusal to participate number and percentage.
d.Identify the characteristics of the sample.
e.Identify the sample mortality (or attrition) number and percentage.
f.Indicate the type of consent obtained and institutional review board approval.
g.Identify the study setting and indicate whether it is appropriate for the study purpose.
a.Identify the author of each instrument.
b.Identify the type of each measurement strategy (i.e. Likert scale, visual analog scale, physiological measure, questionnaire, observation, or interview).
c.Identify the level of measurement (nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio) achieved by each measurement strategy.
d.Discuss how the instrument was developed.
e.Report the reliability of each instrument from previous studies and the current study.
f.Report the validity of each instrument from previous studies and the current study.
a.If appropriate, identify the intervention protocol.
b.Detail how the data were collected.
a.List the statistical procedures used to describe the sample.
b.Was the level of significance or alpha identified? If so, indicate what it was (.05, .01, or .001).
c.List each objective, question, or hypothesis and: (1) identify the focus (description, relationships, or differences) of each objective, question, or hypothesis and (2) list the statistical procedures, the statistics, specific results, and probability value (p = ) in a table as shown next.
a.Are the findings related back to the study framework?
b.Which findings are in keeping with those expected?
c.Which findings were unexpected?
d.Are the findings consistent with previous research findings?
Can't decide on a topic? Need ideas or inspiration for research in your field of study? Paper Masters provides topic suggestions to make your decision easier.