On Liberty

Research Papers, custom written, focus on On Liberty, written in 1859 by John Stuart Mill, and may look at the rhetroical strategies that Mill used. Mill espoused liberalism and utilitarianism as well as championing individual's rights. On Liberty research papers, illustrate clearly Mill's ideas on individuality as a Utilitarian, Mill believes that what brings about the greatest good to the citizenship is what is "right".
Mill objects to the restrictions on human liberty that the government imposes on people for the sake of human welfare. Thus in your research paper, show that his argument for individuality is founded upon the assertion that it is always wrong to restrict the freedom of another person, as long as it does not harm others. For a man must seek what makes him happiest, since happiness is the ultimate goal.
Examples of Rhetorical Strategies Used
To impart his ideals, Mill uses several rhetorical strategies, for example:
- Often, he uses oppositions to create a spirit of controversy in an "us" verses "them" atmosphere. Words such as "friends" and "partisans" are against their "opponents" and give way to a pervasive feeling of battle. Mill sets up his argument this way to encourage debate, which he asserts is essential in the political arena.
- Another devise used to create oppositions in his argument is positioning philosophers against each other. On Liberty places Plato and Descartes on one side and Socrates and Bacon on the other.
Rhetorical Strategies Used in On Liberty by Mill
This rhetorical structure is essential to Mill and his representation of "good" and "bad" interpretations of democracy. Mill admits to this directly in the beginning of On Liberty:
Identification of interest between the rulers and the ruled, being, therefore, in a literal sense, impossible to be realized, must not be spoken of as a condition which a government must absolutely fulfill; but as an end to be incessantly aimed at, and approximated to as nearly as circumstances render possible, and as is compatible with the regard due to other ends.
Mill sets himself apart as an advocate of liberty in the process of deliberating individuality. He is both passionate defender of liberty and an intelligent equalizer of the justification of the individual's goals. As an advocate, he thwarts the label of "justifier" and avoids having to defend whether the facts fit into his assumptions or whether terms such as "good" need to be defined further. An advocate is not a philosopher, he is closer to a politician.
The strategy that Mill has adopted in the third chapter of On Liberty is one of a free forum debate. Mill clearly states that opinions should be given "without reserve". He than examines whether this is a valid form of political formulating of ideas. The distinction between debate and implementation of ideas must be made, for action is not the purpose of debate. By opening up the floor for debate, Mill is setting up his audience to be relaxed and agreeable. He is asserting that his ideas are merely opinion and thus should not be immediately discarded or accepted. This is a strategy that involves winning one's adversaries over with a common agreement on an issue not central to the main contention. Mill has the reader agreeing with him before he begins his subject matter, a common strategy of an adept politician.
Next Mill uses the strategy of association to link himself with a well-known and respected politician and philosopher, Wilhelm von Humboldt. By linking himself with someone commonly known and accepted as credible, Mill lends himself credibility. This leads him into his topic of the individual.
Interestingly, he begins this again by forcing the reader into agreement with facts that are undeniable. His use of language forces the reader into agreement by stating that it would be "absurd" to disagree.
No one's idea of excellence in conduct is that people should do absolutely nothing but copy one another. No one would assert that people ought not to put into their mode of life, and into the conduct of their concerns, any impress whatever of their own judgment, or of their own individual character. On the other hand, it would be absurd to pretend that people ought to live as if nothing whatever had been known in the world before they came into it; as if experience had as yet done nothing towards showing that one mode of existence, or of conduct, is preferable to another. Nobody denies that people should be so taught and trained in youth, as to know and benefit by the ascertained results of human experience.
Notice the use of "no one's idea of excellence" and "No one would assert" and "it would be absurd". These phrases suggest that a person is not normal if he/she disagrees with the obvious that Mill is attempting to postulate. By using the word absurd, Mill contends that unless one agrees with his assertion, they will be considered absurd. Again, an adept argumentative style, particularly for winning agreement.
Related Research Paper Topic Suggestions
Agenda Voting Vs. Approval Voting - Agenda Voting Vs. Approval Voting research papers look at the two party system versus a political science proposal of agenda voting.
Athens and Democracy - Athens and Democracy research papers explore the political system of Athens.
Cambodia and Democracy - Cambodia and Democracy research papers discuss the efforts of Cambodia to transition toward democracy. Topic ideas include discussing the fact that since the Vietnamese military retreated in 1989, Cambodia has been struggling toward democratic consolidation.
Civil Disobedience - Civil Disobedience Research Papers discuss Thoreau's argument on how it helps our democracy.
Classical Liberalism - Classical Liberalism research papers from Paper Masters provide you with custom writing on Classical Liberalism.
Democracy - Democracy research papers examine the system of government in which all citizens are involved in the decision making process. Trace the history of democracy, the philosophy behind democracy or how democracy affects society in research written by the writers at Paper Masters.
Democratic Countries - Democratic Countries custom research papers are written on the countries with a system of government chosen by universal suffrage, or the right of each adult citizen to vote.
Democratic Party - Democratic Party research papers discuss one of the two major political parties in the United States that represents the liberal side of the political debate.
John Stuart Mill - John Stuart Mill research papers examine one of the most influential thinkers of the 19th century and major proponent of utilitarianism.
John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism - John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism research papers discuss one of John Mill's most famous philosophical works that explores normative ethics.
Liberal Democracy - Liberal Democracy essays examine the form of government characterized by free and open society that protects the rights of the individual or minorities, has the rule of law well established and codified political freedom in a representative government.
Liberal Feminism - Liberal Feminism research papers discuss the type of feminism that focuses on women’s ability to maintain equality through individual actions and choices.
Liberal Party - Liberal Party research papers look into the politics, and ideology of Liberalism across the globe and in the United States.
Political Participation Assignment - A research paper on political participation will teach you how our government works and why participation from citizens is so vital. Paper Masters can explicate any aspect of the political process or government that you need examined to better understand your role as a participant in democracy.
Post War International Politics - Post War International Politics Research Papers discuss the practices of politics and focuses on liberalism and realism.
Right To Vote - Right to Vote research papers discuss the ability of participating in the political process of a democracy.
To End War - To End War Research Papers discuss a book by Richard Holbrooke allows us to observe a diplomatic mission from start to finish.