District of Columbia V Heller
Supreme court cases that examine the constitutionality of various proposals are frequently written about by the writers at Paper Masters. Our legal and judicial writers examine cases such as DC vs. Heller and explain their outcome in a case brief or in a complete research paper.
One of the more recent landmark Supreme Court cases is District of Columbia v. Heller, in which the Court, by a 5-4 decision, ruled that individual citizens did have the right to possess firearms, largely without restriction, for lawful purposes, such as self-defense. This ruling was issued on June 26, 2008. Specifically, it struck down part of the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 as unconstitutional, based on a majority interpretation of the Second Amendment.
Within the boundaries of Washington, D.C., the Firearms Control Act restricted residents from owning handguns, and that all rifles or shotguns needed to be unloaded, disassembled, or secured with a trigger lock. In 2003, six DC residents filed a lawsuit, challenging the constitutionality of this law. Eventually, the case reached the Supreme Court, the first time since 1939 that the high court had chosen to rule on a Second Amendment issue.
The case was controversial on both sides of the gun issue.
- Many members of Congress, along with Vice President Dick Cheney signed an amicus curiae brief
- The amicus curiae brief affirmed that the ban on firearms by Congress should be overturned.
- Oral arguments took place on March 18, 2008, with the ruling issued, as tradition, at the end of the Court's term in June.
- The Court decided that the 2nd Amendment does not guarantee the right to keep and carry any weapon for any reason at all, but that there can be no restrictions on handguns for lawful intent.
Related Research Paper Topic Suggestions
Brown V Board of Education - A research paper on the case Brown v. the Board of Education shows Brown v. the Board of Education was brought about as a major challenge to the principle of separate but equal.
Casey Anthony Trial - Casey Anthony Trial research papers reveal the way that media influence, including the way it is presented online, affects public perception.
Edwards Aguillard - Edwards v. Aguillard term papers discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case in which the constitutionality of Louisiana law requiring schools to teach creationism was heard.
Elizabeth Smart Case - Elizabeth Smart disappeared from her home in Salt Lake City, Utah on June 5, 2002 and was held as a sex slave for 10 months. Criminal justice research papers on The Elizabeth Smart Case are available at Paper Masters.
How Kristin Died - How Kristen Died Research Papers examine a case study by George Lardner, Jr. and the events that led up to the murder of Kristen Lardner.
Hunting - Hunting Research Papers discuss an argumentative paper that presents facts about why hunting shouldn't be prohibited.
Jodi Arias Trial - Research papers on Jodi Arias Trial discuss the trial of Jodi Arias that received significant media attention in the United States through early 2013, before Ms. Arias was sentenced to life in prison.
Mapps V. Ohio Decision - Mapps v. Ohio Decision research papers discuss the case that extended the exclusionary rule to the states.
Martha Stewart Insider Trading - Research papers on Martha Stewart's insider trading discuss Stewart's conviction and sentencing and how it affected her multimedia empire.
Megans Law - Megan's Law Research Papers go into how this law came into effect.
Reeves Versus Sanderson Plumbing - Reeves Versus Sanderson Plumbing Research Papers deal with a case with age dsicrimination.
Right To Bear Arms - Right to Bear Arms research papers cover the Second Amendment. Paper Masters can help you assemble the important questions to answer in your research paper on the right to bear arms.
Second Amendment - Second Amendment research papers examine the right to bear arms, as determined by the United States Constitution.
Terry v. ohio - Terry v. Ohio Legal Case Brief of the primary constitutional issue of the case which involves the activities of police in the context of a stop and frisk which was a violation of the Fourth Amendment.