Project Delivery Methods
Project Delivery Methods is an incredibly diverse topic and often a student writing a research paper needs help with narrowing it down. Our writers suggest you narrow it by beginning with discussing the advantages and disadvantages of design-bid-build and construction management.
Drawing on the large body of extant published literature on the subject, a research paper on project delivery methods will compare the two most common project deliver methods:
- Traditional design-bid-build approach
- Construction management methods
First, an in-depth examination of each method, its chief characteristics, and inherent benefits and liabilities will be presented. Finally, in conclusion, an overarching assessment of both project delivery methods and the current and future ramifications for the industry will be offered.
In today's increasingly competitive business environment, both design firms and construction firms are seeking new procedural methods that will help them gain a competitive edge in their fields. As the entire industry becomes more sophisticated, and the increased flow of information available to the public has allowed owners to become more informed of state-of-the-art techniques, firms are forced to adapt new ways of approaching contracts and delivering projects in order to maintain a high degree of success and integrity. As a result, many changes have occurred throughout the industry as a whole, offering owners a wide array of options throughout every phase of design and construction.
One of the main areas that has been updated and modernized by new ideas in recent years has been that of project delivery methods. Whereas the traditional design-bid-build approach remained prevalent throughout much of the twentieth century, the last decade has seen an exponential explosion in variations upon that longstanding model. Today, there seem to be few limiting parameters on methods of project delivery, and most major firms are displaying an increased degree of flexibility in the forms of project delivery that they offer their clientele.
However, the industry response to the growing diversity of project delivery methods has not been unanimously positive. It has been observed that the rapid proliferation of new methods has been at the expense of the rigorous industry standards that once governed this part of the process. In addition, a growing contingency of owners has expressed confusion and frustration with the ever-expanding spectrum of project delivery choices. Clearly, the industry has reached an impasse where the true efficacy of various project delivery methods needs to be re-evaluated.